Proposed HUD Rule Prohibits Seller - Financing Without Licence Except For Family Or Own Residence

"The Secure and Fair Enforcement MortgageThe contract is the law among the parties. A property
Licensing Act of 2008 (SAFE Act), as a keyowner has the right to sell his or her property, including
component of the Housing and Economic Recoveryseller-financing to enable a buyer short on cash to
Act of 2008 (Pub.L.110-289) enacted into law on Julyconsummate the sale.
30, 2008, directs all States to adopt licensing andSeller-financing likewise enables a seller to sell his or
registration systems for loan originators that complyher properties faster, and earn income during the
with the minimum standards set by the SAFE Act.duration of the promissory note being financed.
The Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentThe proposed Rule would impair obligations of existing
(HUD) is charged by the SAFE Act with establishingcontracts in cases involving contracts to sell with
and implementing a system for mortgage loanseller-financing, lease with option to buy with
originators in States that do not meet the minimumseller-financing, and other similar contracts.
requirements of the statute. So, HUD published itsProposed Rule ยง3400.13 Requires Individuals To Be
proposed Rule on the minimum standards under theLicensed By States With Exemptions:
SAFE ACT that States need to comply with in3400.13(e) of the proposed Rule provides that a State
licensing loan originators, procedures and actions, asis not required to impose the prohibitions: (a) from
well as its enforcement authority in the Federal"engaging in the business of a loan originator with
Register, Vol. 74, No. 239, December 15, 2009.respect to any dwelling or residential real estate in the
Moreover, HUD proposes "to clarify or interpret certainState, unless the individual first registers and obtains
statutory provisions that pertain to the scope of theand maintains a valid loan originators license for the
SAFE Act licensing requirements, and otherState; and (d) complies with the same requirements in
requirements that pertain to the implementation,the case of an independent contracts engaging in
oversight, and enforcement responsibilities of theresidential mortgage loan origination, if: "(4) an individual
States."who offers or negotiates terms of a residential
The HUD proposed Rule, if codified as a Final Rule ormortgage loan with or on behalf of an immediate
regulation, would eliminate the business strategy offamily member of the individual; and (5) any individual
acquiring and reselling properties through seller financingwho only offers or negotiates terms of a residential
without being licensed as a loan originator, unless: (1.) anmortgage loan secured by a dwelling that served as
individual offers or negotiates terms of a residentialthe individual's residence."....(underscoring supplied)
mortgage loan with or on behalf of a member of his orLoopholes To Proposed Rule:
her immediate family; or (2.) an individual seller providesA loophole to the proposed Rule is for the seller, who
financing to a buyer pursuant to the sale of the seller'sis amenable to seller financing of a residential income
own residence.property, to hire the services of a licensed loan
Proposed Rule Prohibiting Seller Financing Deprivesoriginator to offer or negotiate terms of a residential
Owners Of Property Rights Under The 14THmortgage loan to a prospective buyer.
Amendment:Another loophole is to retain "a licensed attorney who
One of the cherished rights of U.S. citizens is propertyonly negotiates the terms of a residential mortgage
rights protected by the 14th Amendment of theloan on behalf of a client as an ancillary matter to the
Constitution from any state action without due processattorney's representation of the client," and who is not
of law, which allows owners to dispose of their"compensated by a lender, a mortgage broker, or
properties in any way they see fit.other mortgage loan originator or by any agent"
One of their property rights is to sell their propertiesthereof, pursuant to 3400.13(e)(6) of the proposed
through seller financing to assist buyers who cannotRule.
qualify for bank loans. The usury provision (Article 15)Conclusion:
of the California Constitution prohibits loan-shakingThe proposed Rule, prohibiting seller-financing without
activities, charging in excess of 10 percent per annum,loan originator license except for family or one's own
unless exempted by a finance lender's license.residence, should not be codified into regulation
Requiring owners of residential income properties to bebecause it deprives owners of their property rights to
licensed as loan originators in order to sell suchindulge in seller-financing, and it impairs obligations of
properties through seller-financing directly to buyersexisting contracts.
interferes with property rights of owners.If it is found to be within the constitutional rule-making
The proposed Rule seeks to eliminate property rightspower of the Congress delegated to HUD, and not an
exercised by property owners through centuries inover-reaching regulation beyond the scope of the
favor of more regulations and of banks at theSAFE Act, the loopholes of hiring a licensed loan
expense of home buyers with bad credit.originator or licensed attorney are available to owners
Proposed Rule Impairs Obligations Of Existingwilling to do seller-financing.
Contracts Protected By The Constitution: