Mortgage Non-Payer And 'Squatter' Awarded House

Djabar Babai has gone from being heavily in debt toNat West did nothing. The court ruled that because
his mortgage lender to outright home owner in one fellaction started in 1992 it was now 'time-barred' and
swoop, thanks to a favourable ruling by Appeal Courtruled that the mortgage debt of £165,000 be
judges. The decision has catapulted the unemployed,instantly wiped out, making 'squatters' Djabar Babai
failed businessman from being virtually penniless into anand wife Zinat outright owners of the property.
extremely comfortable financial position, as the courtNat West lawyers argued that by awarding the
awarded Babai his home of 16 years, despite owingproperty to the Babais the court would encourage
£165,000 for the property to Nat West.lenders to come down harder on those falling behind
Babai has not paid a penny in mortgage repaymentswith mortgage payments, but the judge's dismissed
since January 1993, but judges in the court of appealthat argument, saying that the bank failed to take
decided that squatter's rights enable him to claim theappropriate action over 16 years, not a number of
property outright, after Nat West bank took too long inmonths.
their attempts to enforce repossession. This decisionThis decision has some interesting implications, not
means that the bank must now write off theleast of which affect Babai and his credit worthiness.
mortgage on the property in Stockport, although theyAs he was declared bankrupt in 1994, that information
are considering an appeal to the House of Lords in awill now have disappeared from his credit reports, and
final last-ditch attempt to overturn the Court of Appealbecause the repossession action is now struck out by
ruling.the high court that too will disappear from his credit file.
Nat West first made a formal demand to recover itsSo, with assets of over £200,000 and no or
outstanding debt in 1992, following which Babai agreedminimal debt, Babai should be able to rebuild his credit
to repay his mortgage at the rate of £40 perscore extremely quickly, and maybe start a new
month. However, after making only a handful ofbusiness using his house as collateral.
payments, Nat West failed to take any further stepsHis future certainly looks far brighter than it did one
towards repossession. In the absence of any action byyear ago. From being in an almost hopeless financial
the bank Babai and his family continued to live in thesituation Babai now has the world at his feet, pending
house, without paying any further mortgageany decision from Nat West to make a final appeal to
repayments.the House of Lords. Until the bank declares its
Some seven years later, Babai wrote to Nat West'sintentions Babai will be no doubt be keeping his fingers
solicitors outlining his hopeless financial situation, and stillcrossed that his newly acquired property remains his!